Bing has compensated college teachers to create educational papers that help its views on general public policy dilemmas.
That’s based on a study by the Wall Street Journal that’s based on an analysis of 329 research papers identified by the Campaign for Accountability advocacy group as linked to Google in some way tuesday.
The non-profit’s research revealed why these research documents, published between 2005 to 2017 and addressing policy topics like antitrust problems, “were for some reason funded because of the organization,” the Campaign for Accountability had written.
Get Information Sheet, Fortune’s technology publication.
The Journal’s report also incorporates e-mails from teachers that highlight a few of the real means Bing (GOOG) wanted to influence their writings. University of Florida legislation teacher Daniel Sokol, as an example, penned a paper that is academic stated Google’s managing of user data—a controversial issue for privacy advocates—was legal.
Nonetheless, Sokol neglected to reveal the law company he struggled to obtain as being a part-time attorney represents Bing. Furthermore, email messages uncovered by the Journal show that Sokol evidently asked Bing for the money to greatly help persuade other teachers to create policy documents according to unspecified patent problems together with a google-backed conference that is online.
Bing told the Journal so it failed to spend any teachers, but email messages between Sokol and Bing reveal that Sokol asked Bing to deliver him “$5,000, like last time” for their just work at the seminar. Sokol told the Journal which he “should have disclosed the sponsorship for such organization and also have now done this.”
Many other examples of Google influencing academics are highlighted by the Journal’s report, including one from University of Michigan legislation teacher Daniel Crane whom declined to simply simply take funds from Bing to guide their paper that argued against “antitrust regulation of search on the internet machines.”